WTO reviews U.S. trade policies
This article is a review by the WTO of trade policy by the U.S. It describes the U.S. dealing with several “shocks” since their last review (2001). However, there are certain areas in which the U.S. could use some improvement. These areas include steel, agriculture, and clothing and textile. These areas have put a strain on U.S. trade, consumers, and taxpayers. The successful macroeconomic policies of the U.S. have been able to help during its recovery process. This has allowed the U.S. to sustain growth, which in turn has helped the global economy. It also states that the U.S. has been making efforts to open up the doors to countries and help in the multilateral systems. There is also a warning about the increased security measures taken after 9/11. The concern is that these measures might put in place trade or investment barriers. If we inadvertently put up investment barriers we might be in some deep trouble. With the largest budget deficit on record occurring last year, foreign investment has picked up the slack of falling private savings.
The review is http://docsonline.wto.org/GEN_viewerwindow.asp?D:/DDFDOCUMENTS/T/WT/PRESS/TPRB226.DOC.HTM
The review is http://docsonline.wto.org/GEN_viewerwindow.asp?D:/DDFDOCUMENTS/T/WT/PRESS/TPRB226.DOC.HTM

5 Comments:
At 10:47 PM, DudeWMC said…
Maybe all this will bring nations together or tear them apart depending on the decisions made. If other nations can help maybe we will be better, after all we do help other nations whenever something bad happens to them.
At 9:44 PM, priestdarko1 said…
DudeWMC,
I'm confused, are you talking about foreign aid or foreign investment. What I was talking about was our national deficit. If it wasn't for the large availability of foreign investment we would not be able to maintain the large federal deficit. We have to borrow the money from some where in order to run the government and our private savings is not enough. So we get what we need to make it up from foreign investment. This article described concerns about blocking out that foreign investment through higher security measures. I don't really know what would happen if foreign investment was blocked from coming in, but I know it wouldn't be a good thing. I don't really know how foreign aid plays in to all of this.
At 9:44 PM, priestdarko1 said…
DudeWMC,
I'm confused, are you talking about foreign aid or foreign investment. What I was talking about was our national deficit. If it wasn't for the large availability of foreign investment we would not be able to maintain the large federal deficit. We have to borrow the money from some where in order to run the government and our private savings is not enough. So we get what we need to make it up from foreign investment. This article described concerns about blocking out that foreign investment through higher security measures. I don't really know what would happen if foreign investment was blocked from coming in, but I know it wouldn't be a good thing. I don't really know how foreign aid plays in to all of this.
At 9:44 PM, priestdarko1 said…
DudeWMC,
I'm confused, are you talking about foreign aid or foreign investment. What I was talking about was our national deficit. If it wasn't for the large availability of foreign investment we would not be able to maintain the large federal deficit. We have to borrow the money from some where in order to run the government and our private savings is not enough. So we get what we need to make it up from foreign investment. This article described concerns about blocking out that foreign investment through higher security measures. I don't really know what would happen if foreign investment was blocked from coming in, but I know it wouldn't be a good thing. I don't really know how foreign aid plays in to all of this.
At 4:40 PM, DanielJ said…
I would prefer strict immigration/custom policies over a balanced budget any day. A balanced budget does me no good if I am not alive to see it.
Post a Comment
<< Home